Rapid Prototyping Paper
Compare & Contrast outline
Ashbaugh, M. L. (2013). EXPERT INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER VOICES: Leadership Competencies Critical to Global Practice and Quality Online Learning Designs. Quarterly Review Of Distance Education, 14(2), 97-118.
Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. H. (1999). Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Combs, B. (2012). Assessing and Addressing Literacy Needs : Cases and Instructional Strategies. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
Kattington, L. E. (2010). Handbook of Curriculum Development. New York: Nova Science.
Magliaro, S. G., & Shambaugh, N. (2006). Student Models of Instructional Design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(1), 83-106.
Spuches, C. M., & Coufal, J. E. (2000). Focusing on Process to Improve Learning: A Case Study of Instructional Research and Development. Innovative Higher Education, 24(3), 183-202.
Kelders, S. M., Pots, W. M., Oskam, M., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. C. (2013). Development of a web-based intervention for the indicated prevention of depression. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 13(1), 1-11. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-26
Smith, S. (2013). Through the Teacher's Eyes: Unpacking the TPACK of Digital Fabrication Integration in Middle School Language Arts. Journal Of Research On Technology In Education, 46(2), 207-227.
Hung, W., Smith, T., Harris, M., & Lockard, J. (2010). Development research of a teachers’ educational performance support system: the practices of design, development, and evaluation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(1), 61-80. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9080-3
1. Here is a paper that compared the Addie and Diamond
http://ejadair.myweb.uga.edu/portfolio/diamond.pdf
2. If anything it gives more sources.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED411780.pdf
3. This gives some basics of rapid
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jmargeru/prototyping/#rapid_prototyping
4. here is one more about rapid P.
http://carbon.ucdenver.edu/~bwilson/training.html
---------------------
Diamond Model info
Named after Robert Diamond (I was a bit disappointed to find that was the reason for the name)
Focuses on two major phases
Phase 1: Project Selection and Design
Feasibility and desirability examined
Begin thinking of an “ideal” solution without regard to existing constraints
Results in more creativity
Operation plan
Goals, timeline, human/other resources, student needs
Phase 2: Production, Implementation, and Evaluation
Seven step process
Determine the unit’s objectives
Design of evaluation instruments and procedures
Here is a model that we will need to reconstruct in higher resolution at some point.
I pulled this info from this book. (67-68)
I did pulled some general information about each model and tried to organize it more succinctly. I found it difficult to find information on the Diamond Model online, but I think that the manual might be available. (Neater version:model chart.docx )
|
Instructional Model
|
Key Components
|
Benefits
|
Drawbacks
|
|
Diamond Model
https://sites.google.com/site/shawncates/home/instructional-design-models-in-a-nutshell
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC550993/
http://www2.potsdam.edu/betrusak/621/survey_of_intructional_development_models.pdf
|
- · Used in higher education with sensitivity to political/social issues
- · Linear development
- · 2 Phases
- o Phase one determines feasibility
- o Phase two is design/implementation with seven steps
- · Focus on creating learner centered curriculum
- · Heavy use of flow charts, process diagrams, and organizational charts
|
- · Focuses on teamwork amongst college/university faculty for development.
- · Faculty must take ownership for this model to be effective
-
|
- · Only applicable to institutions of higher learning (although could be stretched in some instances)
- ·
|
|
Rapid Prototyping
Boulet, Guy. Rapid prototyping: an efficient way to collaboratively design and develop e-learning content. http://www.guyboulet.net/site/docs/Rapid_prototyping.pdf
|
- · Used for e-learning of all types
- · Nonlinear development.
- · 7 overlapping stages (typically, but can include more for review and redesign of prototype)
- · All team members involved at an early stage
- · Develop prototype in first stages and refine continuously.
- · Discussion of prototype is done throughout
- · Facts and results of prototype are analyzed
- · Continuous evaluation
- · Ideally, 4-8 future learners are engaged in review of instruction
|
- · Relies on team-work
- · All team members are fully engaged throughout the design process
- · Focus is on the actual e-learning prototype, not theory.
|
- · Development done too quickly can lead to inferior end results.
- · Collaboration could be done too close to end date and final product may not have been evaluated and redesigned as needed due to deadline.
|
1.- Rapid Prototyping Model:
http://www.comp.dit.ie/dgordon/courses/ilt/ilt0004/rapidprototypinganalternativeinstructionaldesign.pdf
Graphic representation of Model
2.- Diamond model:
http://mskim.myweb.uga.edu/eportfolio/docs/EDIT6180IDModel.pdf
http://www.threatconnect.com/files/uploaded_files/The_Diamond_Model_of_Intrusion_Analysis.pdf
Comments (2)
Marie Lara said
at 6:27 am on Mar 25, 2014
Please check the page Charts & Diagrams which has several of these files. I have uploaded the model descriptions of both models - just click on the link description. There is a follow-up paper to the original Rapid Prototyping Model by Daughtery, Yeng and Cornachione that expands and restates many of Tripp & Bechelmeyer's designs. I bought the textbook that describes the Diamond Model, but it is 370 + pages, so I pulled chapter 5 from the textbook which is the actual description of the model and its benefits.
Josh Malone said
at 10:39 pm on Mar 27, 2014
I recreated the charts from your book on the Diamond model.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.